©Pietro Masturzo
-
some very good photos/storys. thanks
-
Yes, some very good pictures. The winner is weak to me.
-
Kay, I do agree with you.
-
the winner is not the typical WOW effect picture.
-
When the failed revolution would had been financed and managed largely through the CIA.
Would that change anything?
-
I was surprised to see this heavy black vignetting and black overtones acceptable to the world press, but I guess it does not qualify for altering the photo. Apparently, this guy went too far : http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/03/behind-35/
-
This Rudik is highly suspicious!!! I nowhere find a website and photos of him.
Is he even a real photographer ?? ;)))
I do like the comment of Craig Warga. Sums it up to me.
http://lens.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/03/03/behind-35/#comment-67523Thank you Kay for the link to the image. It took me some minutes to find this foot.
http://www.bjp-online.com/public/showPage.html?page=873606 -
The picture who won the premium award, the above posted, is no photograph it is a frame of a video file !!!
Interview with the photographer of the picture above posted
http://www.rearviewmirror.it/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=353&Itemid=80 -
hard to believe…….wow! i’m losing respect for this World Press Award… or i just need to realign myself into the age of video. i’m very surprised.
-
Short video of jury chair Ayperi Karabuda Ecer.
http://www.worldpressphoto.org/index.php?option=com_media_gallery&area=showGallery&task=view&id=26&Itemid=201&bandwidth=high -
Disqualified World Press Photo speaks out, says retouching was legitimate
13 comments